![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqAir11IVtAlqjAJebOORHtBmUrszZjQi7rKqV3KW4sawuOzmtUJVRHJXDTzv81_u945oj5zFHjsKRw8mx3NffBwpE-KyHDhi9mdAn2Yw9b8dPGxXukxPW80QFYj61lZDzAZLc/s400/Pruning+cut+photo+by+Earl.jpg)
This enigmatic photo appeared in an Ottawa Citizen story here.
The photo is credited to yours truly. I do have vague memories of taking the shot; I'm pretty sure it's Jim Hole's hand. We were writing an article on the proper pruning cut. How the shot wound up in the Citizen, WITH credit, is a mystery to me.
3 comments:
Good to see you back and blogging! Susan.
Hmmm, tough to see if it's being done properly, but a cut should've been done on the bottom of the branch first - this stops the falling branch from peeling a huge strip of bark down the tree. Paul T.
You're quite right, Paul, an undercut is required, and we definitely pointed it out in the original article. If I remember correctly, the first cut being made is just preliminary; before sawing all the way through, you must make a cut on the underside of the branch to prevent the stripping problem.
Post a Comment